A Short History of HIV/AIDS
We do not know how many people developed AIDS in the 1970s, or in the years before. Nor do
we know where the AIDS virus HIV originated.
We do know:
The dominant feature of this first period was silence, for HIV was unknown and transmission was
not accompanied by symptoms salient enough to be noticed. Rare, sporadic case reports of AIDS
and sero-archaeological studies have documented human infections with HIV prior to 1970, but
available data suggest that the current pandemic started in the mid to late 1970s.
By 1980, HIV had spread to at least five continents (North and South America, Europe, Africa, and Australia).
During this period of silence, spread was unchecked and approximately 100,000 — 300,000 persons
may have been infected.
In 1982 US health officials described a new disease known as AIDS, acquired immunodeficiency
syndrome and in 1984 HIV was identified as the cause of AIDS.
More than 2000 people attended the first international Conference on AIDS held in Atlanta in
1985. The three major topics of discussion were the new HTLV-III/LAV test, the situation with
regard to AIDS internationally, and the extent of heterosexual transmission.
Some experts were skeptical that AIDS would spread as rapidly among heterosexuals as it had
among homosexuals. Yet other experts, taking their cues from data emerging from preliminary
studies from Africa showing equal distribution among males and females, were less sure.
Immediately after the conference, the World Health Organization (WHO) convened
an international meeting to consider the AIDS pandemic and to initiate concerted worldwide
action.
In 1989, predictions of 10 million infections, mostly in Africa, were dismissed by the medical
AIDS establishment as alarmist. Seven years later, experts predicted 40 million. Now there seems
little that will stop the number from reaching 100 million! This is more than five times the
number who have died in the previous two decades.
The vast majority of these will be in Africa.
Africa’s HIV/AIDS problems are huge. The spread of the HIV/AIDS epidemic in Africa is a
result of, but not exclusive to:
- The deprivation trap as a result of poverty
- Government policy
- Low status of women in the society
The poor are trapped in a cycle of poverty and as a result suffer disadvantage and
marginalization. The cycle is sometimes referred to as the deprivation trap, with five clusters of
disadvantage — poverty, physical weakness, isolation, vulnerability, and powerlessness.
The starting-point is the poor household. Families are generally large, consisting of many
children, as well as the aged and disabled.
Families have too little money to provide adequately for basic needs. Malnutrition is rife, leading
to poor performance in school and lower labour output. As most of these households live in rural
areas, they are isolated from social infrastructure such as transportation routes, schools, and
medical facilities.
Landlords and traditional authorities can also make households vulnerable.
These families live from hand to
mouth. If the father dies or is absent, survival becomes even tougher. The mother must find
work and the children are left in the care of the elderly or without care at all. The household may
also be powerless against those they rely upon for their livelihood.
These families have no ability to influence policy decisions that would improve their well being.
Many have observed that this deprivation trap is one of the biggest determinants in the spread of
HIV:
- HIV/AIDS is not a major priority in situations where basic survival is a daily battle.
- Knowledge about HIV and how to prevent it is lacking. When there is no access to the
structures that provide the education, such as schools or clinics, this knowledge gap
cannot be easily bridged.
- In general health is poor so the virus is more easily transmitted throughout the
community.
- Access to medicines and basic healthcare is denied. It is widely accepted that Anti-
Retroviral Treatment (ART) given at the appropriate stages of the illness along with
improved nutrition and administration of complimentary medicines would greatly reduce
the number of HIV positive people developing AIDS.
The low status of women in the society allows them to be exploited and abused. Of the 3000
maternal deaths reported in South Africa in 2001, the leading cause was HIV/AIDS. Women
with HIV also transfer it to their babies so the cycle doesn’t break. AZT or Neverapine administered to mothers and infants at birth would greatly reduce the transfer of HIV from
mother to babies but the government has not and will not make this drug available.
Maple Grove Responds
The HIV/AIDS crisis world wide is great. The HIV/AIDS crisis in Africa is overwhelming. How
can we help? With so much need, what can one person or even one church do to make a
difference?
"I tell you the truth, whatever you did for one of the least of
these brothers of mine, you did for me." — Matthew 25:40
The Outreach Committee has spent a lot of time discussing how we at Maple Grove can make a
difference. In February of 2003, during Outreach Month, the committee presented information about
HIV/AIDS to the congregation. Brenda Zimmerman told us about an effective programme in
South America, the committee set up displays in the gym to educate us all, and as a congregation
we sent a petition to Ottawa urging the government to remember their budget commitments to the
fight against HIV/AIDS around the world.
Now we have the opportunity to make a real difference — not to everyone with HIV/AIDS — but to
one family whose lives have been affected very personally by HIV/AIDS: our
Action For Aids project.